What defines moral disagreements, and how should we respond to them? This book answers these questions through an intuitionist theory. It does so by linking and enriching ethical and epistemological debates about dissent. The central argument is to show that disagreement is a multifaceted phenomenon and that some disagreements remain unresolvable despite the best efforts of all involved, because different judgements may be equally justified. It is shown that such unresolvable moral disagreements are, on the one hand, compatible with moral realism, as usually represented by ethical intuitionism, and, on the other hand, are not always problematic for our social coexistence.
Review-Documentation
Double Peer Review (Full Text, Pre-publication) + Scientific Board Selection
